It’s from her new book, just out, Dinosaur Police.
And no sooner had Sarah McIntyre agreed to join us in our discussion [on 15th May]than my Twitter stream — and The Bookseller’s and The FutureBook’s — lit up with this great banner.
Give me artwork for #FutureChat and I’ll follow you all the way to 4 p.m. London time.
And she is also behind the hashtag #PicturesMeanBusiness.
As soon as I saw the blue of her banner show up on Twitter, I caught wise to one reason — I think — that illustrators don’t always get the credit they deserve in the industry: they make it look so easy. I’m not kidding, this started appearing within minutes of reading McIntyre’s email saying she’d join us today. My Bookseller colleague Charlotte Eyre (pictured) had invited her to #FutureChat at my request because she, Eyre, has written a story in today’s edition of The Bookseller on this issue: Nielsen calls for debate over crediting illustrators.
Here’s the lead of Eyre’s piece:
The trade has welcomed a debate over the lack of recognition for illustrators, but Nielsen — the global measurement company that supplies the charts to The Bookseller — has warned that the issue of gathering data is not clear-cut.
Its comments came after illustrators such as Sarah McIntyre and Axel Schefflercomplained of a lack of credit for their work from award organisers and the media, pointing to the fact that their names are omitted from Nielsen BookScan ratings.
And as a sidebar to that piece from Eyre, we have an opinion piece from McIntyre, Comment: Credit where it’s due. She writes:
The #PicturesMeanBusiness campaign, which strives to have illustrators recognised by the media, has already achieved the following things: the Carnegie Medal now includes illustrators’ names in listings (the Geenaway, an award for illustration, has always listed writers); The Bookseller’s sales charts now include illustrators; and The Book People and The Reading Agency have recently amended listings on their websites to include illustrators.
Why does it matter? Books sell because of pictures, not just words. Listings increasingly depend on metadata, instead of someone actually looking at the cover of a book. Awards committees copy and paste data straight onto their websites, and this often doesn’t include illustrators.
McIntyre, whose new Dinosaur Police is just out in the States from Scholastic, makes her case well. Her illustrator-cohorts are lucky to have such an articulate spokes ‘strator.
Guess who doesn’t have such a friend in their corner: writers.
Why I’m not surprised at what McIntyre is up against: #CreditWriters.
For several years now, I’ve been irritating people from time to time with the hashtag #CreditWriters.
And guess who isn’t good at crediting writers: writers.
Writers don’t credit writers.
You think I’m making this up, right? Wrong.
Check your Twitter stream. Go ahead, stick your disbelieving head into the fire hose: tweet after tweet from one or another writer flies by with the name of a blog post or article… a link to that blog post or article… the site on which that blog post or article appears…but not who wrote the piece.
Apparently, it’s too much to ask writers to notice bylines. Uh-huh. That community of “creatives,” as so many of them like to call themselves, while enjoying painting themselves as a world of put-upon, generous, sharing, mutually supportive, ill-treated people, cannot be bothered to notice who wrote something and credit that fellow author, let alone search out that writer’s Twitter handle. (Because too many of our media still won’t put Twitter handles into bylines like this Porter Anderson / @Porter_Anderson.) These writers can find five seconds to hit the auto-tweet thingie but they can’t find five more seconds to add the name or (better) Twitter handle of the writer before they send that tweet.
I call this lazy, I call it callous, and I say such writers are in bad faith: they are not supporting each other: I’m not surprised at the experience of McIntyre and other illustrators.
When I teach courses on writerly use of Twitter at conferences and in other settings, I advise writers to favour the name or handle of an author over the medium in which their story appears. That’s right. I’d rather see you credit@xanalter than @NYTimes if you’re running out of space in a 140-character tweet. Why? Because the Timesdoesn’t need the credit. The writer does.
McIntyre is better at explaining this than I am. In her commentary for us today, she writes:
It’s not an ego issue; making a career in books today relies more and more on branding. If an illustrator’s name isn’t attached to a book, it does little to keep that illustrator in work.
Isn’t that beautifully said?
There’s an industry list-serv I see daily: you’d be amazed (maybe disgusted) with how frequently someone we usually classify as an “industry leader” will engage in a long chain of email debate about a story posted at one site or another…and no one ever takes the time to mention the name of the writer who wrote what they’re debating. No, it’s just “The Times has an article…” or “The Bookseller is writing…” or “There’s a piece from Paris Review…” and off they go. It tells you a lot, I’m afraid, about an Older World’s devaluation of the creative corps. And it makes it all the uglier that so many in our Newer World of digital smarties are just as feckless.
By Porter Anderson
The FutureBook: Why don’t book people credit Illustrators?
Read the full post at: TheBookseller.com/futurebook
This story was written as a walkup to the #FutureChat of 15th May 2015. Join The Bookseller’s The FutureBook #FutureChat each Friday at 4 p.m. London (BST), 5 p.m. Rome (CEST), 11 a.m. New York (ET), 10 a.m. Chicago (CT), 9 a.m. Denver (MT), 8 a.m. Los Angeles (PT), 5 a.m. Honolulu (HAST).