Writing on the Ether | JaneFriedman.com

Tools of Change, Tim O'Reilly, O'Reilly Media, publishing, books, conference, ebook, TOC, #toccon, Porter Anderson, Writing on the Ether, Jane Friedman, Joe Wikert, Kat Meyer, New York Public Library, New York City, DBW, Digital Book World, LeVar Burton, Baratunde Thurston, Ed Nawotka, Publishing Perspectives, Joe Karaganis, Tim Carmody, Eric Ries,

Tools of Change (ToC) Con­fer­ence 2012 atten­dees are wel­comed at a recep­tion at the New York Pub­lic Library.

By Porter Ander­son | @Porter_Anderson

 

From Feb­ru­ary 16, 2012
Part of my series of columns on pub­lish­ing, Writ­ing on the Ether, appear­ing Thurs­days through the kind (and brave) benev­o­lence of Jane Fried­man at JaneFriedman.com

ToC: Techno-calities

Locu­tion, locu­tion, locution.

In its sixth year, the Tools of Change Con­fer­ence — just closed in New York City — eas­ily held its own as one of publishing’s two great con­fabs of a stress­ful year, the other being last month’s Dig­i­tal Book World Con­fer­ence + Expo.

And when it comes to locu­tion, ye shall know them by how they say “data.”

January’s DBW (#dbw12) used “fol­low­ing data” to tell us where things lie (not lay, damn it) amid the sink­holes of today’s treach­er­ous, fast-digitizing landscape.

February’s ToC (#TOC­con) vowed to wield “Big Data” as a pho­ton tor­pedo, LeVar Bur­ton, in the bat­tle for publishing’s cul­tural viability.

Bur­ton gave a Treky’s keynote on Tues­day in which he revealed that spot­ting Nichelle Nichols on the orig­i­nal bridge of Gene Roddenberry’s USS Enter­prise helped him find his race and place in an enter­tain­ment indus­try that would later cast him in Alex Haley’s piv­otal “Roots” and now plat­forms his RRKidz mis­sion to get dig­i­tal read­ing to kidz (not kids, damn it).

Cock­tails at one of my favorite joints on the planet! http://t.co/Ryi2u3L3
@levarburton
LeVar Bur­ton

 

Speak­ing of race, another adher­ent of Lt. Uhura’s per­sua­sion, author and Onion­ist Baratunde Thurston, gave another keynote that day, plug­ging his book.

Tools of Change, Tim O'Reilly, O'Reilly Media, publishing, books, conference, ebook, TOC, #toccon, Porter Anderson, Writing on the Ether, LeVar Burton
Author Baratunde Thurston’s keynote at ToC 2012: all about his book, “How To Be Black.”

Here is his keynote on video. Here he is with Terry Gross on NPR’s Fresh Air, in Baratunde Thurston Explains “How To Be Black” And here is his book in an enhanced edi­tion, “enhanced” being a term we include less and less fre­quently in our pub­lish­ing patois.

More locu­tion: ToC and DBW are per­fectly aligned, like squirm­ing twin Cupids, in their use of the term “keynote.” It once referred to an often long, always sin­gu­lar, rabble-rallying speech by a major fig­ure of real heft. You remem­ber Mar­garet Atwood at last year’s ToC? Well, of course you do. And you can refresh your mem­ory when she does it again at AWP in early March.

I want to help. “@: I want to build a spaceship”
@pablod
Pablo Defen­dini

 

Today? Every girl can give a keynote. In fact, every girl and every boy tar­geted by arrows this Valentine’s Day seemed deter­mined to do just that. A “keynote” now lasts 15 min­utes, max. And it arrives in a candy box full of match­ing pre­sen­ta­tions, each of them crinkly-wrapped in the visu­als that we Con­tem­po­rary Peo­ple must behold in order to focus, damn it, focus. The givers of today’s “keynotes” are fre­quently low-energy folks whose first call­ing in life clearly is not ora­tion. They want to tell us that their soft­ware is bet­ter than your software.

They may be right. They may be wrong. They may be spon­sors. And one of them at ToC hid envelopes under the audience’s seats. Ten of those envelopes, we were told, would pro­vide the lucky der­ri­eres above them with iPad 2’s. (I made my col­league Jeremy Green­field check under our seats in the media room. Chew­ing gum. Not an Inkling of a win.)

Did I men­tion locu­tion? It’s all in how we say it, you see.

Imme­di­ate reac­tion to enter­ing the #TOCCON reg­is­tra­tion area — there are way more women atten­dees than most tech confs I’ve been to lately.
@danyork
Dan York

 

Let’s have one more.

“Scal­ing” could mean some­thing less friendly to some soon.

A Wednes­day ses­sion, Scal­ing Con­tent Devel­op­ment Through Automa­tion, gave us Kris­t­ian Ham­mond of Nar­ra­tive Sci­ence and Rob­bie Allen of Auto­mated Insights in their talks on those computer-generated sports and real-estate reports you may have heard about, ex machina.

These punchy accounts of youth hockey matches and other piv­otal events are gen­er­ated, Ham­mond told us, by “a sim­ple set of deriva­tions from the data.” Then “angles” are applied, he said. And he was at pains to tell us, “We’re not writ­ing sto­ries that just express the data…the sys­tem under­stands the trend.”

For the record: This report is writ­ten not by a machine but by a human being made pro­duc­tive by caf­feine rather than elec­tri­cal cur­rent. Parse me, bubba, I’ve got yer data right here.

But ’tis boot­less to exclaim.

By the time the last flotilla of petit-four-sized keynotes eased us all to sleep in our seats on Wednes­day after­noon — never let the ele­gant thinker Theo Gray onto a stage right after lunch to show you his Wol­fram Math­e­mat­ica CDFEd Nawotka man­aged to fire up his Pub­lish­ing Per­spec­tives account and tweet before pass­ing out:

#TOC­con The mes­sage of this afternoon’s keynotes is that the geeks will inherit the earth, or at least, the pub­lish­ing business.
@pubperspectives
Pub­Per­spec­tives

 

Click to read this week’s full Writ­ing on the Ether col­umn at JaneFriedman.com.

About Porter Ander­son

Porter Ander­son, BA, MA, MFA, is a Fel­low with the National Crit­ics Insti­tute and has done spe­cial read­ings in the psy­chol­ogy of the arts at the Uni­ver­sity of Bath, UK. As a jour­nal­ist, he has worked with three net­works of CNN (CNN USA, CNN Inter­na­tional, CNN.com) and was on the lead devel­op­ment team for CNN.com Live. He also has worked on The Vil­lage Voice, Dal­las Times Her­ald, D Mag­a­zine, Sara­sota Herald-Tribune and other out­lets. He writes the weekly (Thurs­days) WRITING ON THE ETHER col­umn at JaneFriedman.com and (Mon­days) ETHER FOR AUTHORS col­umn at PublishingPerspectives.com. Ander­son also is a reg­u­lar con­trib­u­tor to WriterUnboxed.com and to Dig­i­tal Book World’s (DigiBookWorld.com) Expert Pub­lish­ing Blog. He has been posted by the United Nations to Rome (P-5, laissez-passer) for the World Food Pro­gramme, and served as Exec­u­tive Pro­ducer to INDEX: Design to Improve Life in Copen­hagen. He is based in Tampa and his pri­mary medium is Twit­ter. Fol­low him @Porter_Anderson

Writing on the Ether | JaneFriedman.com

Writing on the Ether, Porter Anderson, Jane Friedman, publishing, Tools of Change, T0C, #toccon, Digital Book World, #dbw

By Porter Ander­son | @Porter_Anderson

 

From Feb­ru­ary 9, 2012
Part of my series of columns on pub­lish­ing, Writ­ing on the Ether, appear­ing Thurs­days through the kind (and brave) benev­o­lence of Jane Fried­man at JaneFriedman.com

ToC’s techs to the res­cue! (Green­field, Albanese, Cur­tis, Owen, Shatzkin)

So if Dig­i­tal Book World helped pre­pare our souls for the com­ing tra­vail — as Jeremy Green­field’s ongo­ing DBW Insights show us on a daily basis — the bat­tle now is joined by rein­force­ments, in the form of the annual Tools of Change Con­fer­ence. In ToC we trust.

Selected keynotes and more from the the­ater of endeavor will be streamed live on video for you to see, from the safety of your favorite redoubt.

And there we were, hold­ing the DBW vigil with Bishop Shatzkin; chant­ing BookRe­pub­lic num­bers about ebook adop­tion with Brother Marco; beat­ing our breasts with Friar Mat­teo:

For­give us, we have DRM-ed every­thing in sight like music-industry peo­ple in way­ward sheep’s clothing!

We even had the Sis­ters of Roman­tica enter­tain the troops. But, of course, not enough con­fer­enc­ing yet: our beloved pub­lish­ing indus­try is still under siege from within and without.

Now  the 2012 season’s (and every season’s) best hopes — our tech­nol­o­gists — charge into Man­hat­tan. Weapons are arrayed in the Dig­i­tal Pet­ting Zoo curated by Nate Hof­felder and Joe Wik­ert. Ordained by O’Reilly him­self, the Tools of Change cru­sade con­venes at the Mar­riott, where the indus­try will wres­tle with its dig­i­tal demons. (Yes, even those Small Demons, Rev. Vak­ili.)

Look­ing at the pro­gram­ming for TOC next week. Some really good stuff. Gonna be hard to choose break­out ses­sions in some time slots. #toc­con
@DonLinn
Don Linn

 

One prayer for many, as a recep­tion is staged at the New York Pub­lic Library dur­ing the con­fer­ence: May Pen­guin (and the other Big Six, some day) fol­low Ran­dom­House in enabling full pub­lic book lend­ing. Andrew Albanese gave us the word this way, in Fair Trade: Ran­dom House Will Raise Library E-book Prices, But Com­mits to E-Book Lend­ing.

Rejoice, fel­low Eth­er­naut, let us go into the (next) tem­ple of pub­lish­ing con­fabs, this time to behold Sci­ence as she girds us in this baf­fling War of Dig­i­tal Aggres­sion. Quoth Richard Cur­tis, For the First Time In His­tory, Print Is Optional. Now What?

When we talk about the death of printed books we are really talk­ing about the death of printed books dis­trib­uted in book­stores.  With the death of a Bor­ders and the announced reduc­tion of Barnes & Noble’s  book­store floor space by 25%, print on demand, a busi­ness model that does not depend on store sales or the return­abil­ity of books the way tra­di­tional book­stores do, increas­ingly becomes an option. If pub­lish­ers elect POD for all their books they will not only con­tinue to make money from printed books but could poten­tially res­cue their iden­ti­ties, and maybe their souls as well.

What do you think?

Note to self: “turs­day” is not an actual day.
@Ginger_Clark
Gin­ger Clark

 

Here be the crossed book­marks of titans. And we must turn to Lovely Tech, for she is just about the last god­dess left:

The bot­tom line here is that as Amazon’s power to sign up books away from the major pub­lish­ers grows, the retail­ers who depend on pub­lish­ers for a flow of com­mer­cial prod­uct suf­fer along with the publishers…B&N’s deci­sion seems to me like the right move for them…On the other hand, authors and agents who might have con­sid­ered an Ama­zon pub­lish­ing deal will have to think twice if they know very few book­stores will carry it…There are a lot of smart peo­ple engaged in a pitched bat­tle here.

  • May our writ­ers learn whether and when to till the soil of their own back­yards as self-publishers — and whether and when to enter once more into the Halls of Tra­di­tional Pub­lish­ing. Not that the writ­ers will be at ToC. It’s another grand gath­er­ing, like DBW, designed for every­body in pub­lish­ing except the peo­ple who cre­ate the essen­tial ele­ment of the realm: the sto­ries. It’s under­stand­able but regret­table that the com­mu­nity of authors still can be so dis­tant, at times, dur­ing this rush to dig­i­tal. It affects them keenly.
  • May Knit­ting Laura Daw­son, the Madame Defarge of Fire­brand, guide us to know the dan­gers of the intern-novitiate when you mis-assign your meta­data to pizza-stained hands.
  • May we see — some­where between the River ePub and the Mobi-Dictum — Prior Wik­ert bring­ing us together in the mer­ci­ful sanc­tu­ary of a Uni­fied eBook Mar­ket. More on his call to action in a moment.
  • And may the calm, gra­cious, wel­com­ing friend­li­ness that pas­seth all under­stand­ing of Wikert’s co-chair, the saintly Kat Meyer, rub off on the rest of us.

Here is my and my fel­low sem­i­nar­ian Dan Blank’s lat­est sermon-with-video Pre­view: O’Reilly’s Tools of Change Conference.

Our saints go march­ing into con­fer­ence on Mon­day and raise the fray through Wednes­day. Observe the bat­tle from the safe hill­top of the Twit­ter hash­tag #TOC­con or in the chapel of my site: PorterAnderson.com. Some of our bravest strate­gists are at work here. And the stakes are high for us all.

Dear Twit­ter: can we all resolve to stop say­ing stu­pid shit we know noth­ing about or won’t get edu­cated about? I’ll do the same. Love, me.
@sarahw
Sarah Wein­man

 

Click to read this week’s full Writ­ing on the Ether col­umn at JaneFriedman.com.

About Porter Ander­son

Porter Ander­son, BA, MA, MFA, is a Fel­low with the National Crit­ics Insti­tute and has done spe­cial read­ings in the psy­chol­ogy of the arts at the Uni­ver­sity of Bath, UK. As a jour­nal­ist, he has worked with three net­works of CNN (CNN USA, CNN Inter­na­tional, CNN.com) and was on the lead devel­op­ment team for CNN.com Live. He also has worked on The Vil­lage Voice, Dal­las Times Her­ald, D Mag­a­zine, Sara­sota Herald-Tribune and other out­lets. He writes the weekly (Thurs­days) WRITING ON THE ETHER col­umn at JaneFriedman.com and (Mon­days) ETHER FOR AUTHORS col­umn at PublishingPerspectives.com. Ander­son also is a reg­u­lar con­trib­u­tor to WriterUnboxed.com and to Dig­i­tal Book World’s (DigiBookWorld.com) Expert Pub­lish­ing Blog. He has been posted by the United Nations to Rome (P-5, laissez-passer) for the World Food Pro­gramme, and served as Exec­u­tive Pro­ducer to INDEX: Design to Improve Life in Copen­hagen. He is based in Tampa and his pri­mary medium is Twit­ter. Fol­low him @Porter_Anderson

Writing on the Ether | JaneFriedman.com

By Porter Ander­son | @Porter_Anderson

 

From Feb­ru­ary 2, 2012
Part of my series of columns on pub­lish­ing, Writ­ing on the Ether, appear­ing Thurs­days through the kind (and brave) benev­o­lence of Jane Fried­man at JaneFriedman.com

The fog of war (Grandinetti, Owen, Bosman)

Just ask Ger­aldo Rivera. No, don’t ask him. He might give away the strate­gic loca­tion of that spe­cial Ama­zon ship­ping facil­ity, the one ful­fill­ing an offer of a free Prime pitch­fork with every copy of Join the ePub­lish­ing Gold Rush.

I’m going to shoot up a flare to illu­mi­nate the past week’s events for you, the ones lead­ing up to that dec­la­ra­tion of all-out hos­til­ity we’re now wit­ness­ing. I love the smell of Ether in the morning.

Omi­nous, wasn’t it? — I’m sure you remem­ber the rum­ble of dis­tant artillery last week dur­ing the Dig­i­tal Book World War Coun­cil + Weaponry Expo. We heard it on 25 Jan­u­ary. About 9:15 a.m. in New York, 1415 Zulu.

Things shook a lit­tle. Amazon’s Russ Grandinetti had just told us what a great time it is for read­ers. Espe­cially if you’re the child of a Kin­dle Fire owner, per Jeremy Green­field’s report.

Those faint salvos? Late in the day before, our best scouts had come back into camp with the word that Houghton Mif­flin Har­court would pub­lish the print edi­tions of Amazon’s pub­lish­ing divi­sion run by Larry Kir­sh­baum.  Laura Haz­ard Owen hypoth­e­sized about it at paid­Con­tent in her arti­cle Well, Here’s How Ama­zon Pub­lish­ing Will Get Its Books Into Barnes & Noble. This New Har­vest imprint could be Amazon’s way to breach its “Barnes & Noble prob­lem: Barnes & Noble has said it will not carry any titles in its bricks-and-mortar stores that it can­not also sell as ebooks.”

Was a chal­lenge being issued? And would it be taken up?

As the NYT notices there’s com­pe­ti­tion between AMZN and B&N, the world won­ders “Where ya been?” http://t.co/JrSPuj5m
@DonLinn
Don Linn

 

On the 28th, three days after the brass and their staffers decamped DBW, the able Julie Bosman at the Times ran her story The Bookstore’s Last Stand, an inter­view with B&N’s CEO, William “Custer” Lynch Jr.  He was pic­tured before a pha­lanx of loyal Nooks and talk­ing tough, even as Bosman laid out the stark facts: B&N – at that point – was val­ued at some $719 mil­lion, Ama­zon at $88 bil­lion. ” Lynch was unperturbed.

Our stores are not going anywhere.

By article’s end, Bosman wasn’t rolling ban­dages yet, but some gauze was being stacked up in clean corners.

With­out Barnes & Noble, the pub­lish­ers’ mar­ket­ing propo­si­tion crum­bles. The idea that pub­lish­ers can spot, mold and pub­li­cize new tal­ent, then get some­one to buy books at prices that actu­ally make eco­nomic sense, sud­denly seems a reach…What pub­lish­ers count on from book­stores is the brows­ing effect. Sur­veys indi­cate that only a third of the peo­ple who step into a book­store and walk out with a book actu­ally arrived with the spe­cific desire to buy one.

So they go to browse, do they? As in a show­room, right? Hold that thought.

I’ve met peo­ple senior to me in pub­lish­ing who never remem­ber my name even though we’ve met 5+ times. I’ll never for­get that.
@Ginger_Clark
Gin­ger Clark

 

Pub­lish­ing: The gath­er­ing clouds (O’Leary, Linn)

So by the 30th, we all sat in those cof­fee shops attached to the brightly lit sell­ing places for books (they act like show­rooms, they quack like show­rooms), feed­ing on the heal­ing pro­bity of Brian O’Leary’s ministrations.

He wrote of abun­dance, in Why pyra­mids?

Most of us came to pub­lish­ing, to libraries, to book sell­ing, to writ­ing because we love what this busi­ness could do in the world.  Now’s the time to make that a sus­tain­able reality.

O’Leary was again putting for­ward his idea, backed months ago when we Eth­er­nauts were younger by Don Linn in A Tragedy of the Com­mons, a con­cept of a uber-organization, a con­clave embrac­ing publishing’s major mili­tia, its myr­iad fac­tions, the great armies, and maybe even your more coop­er­a­tive guerrillas.

O’Brien sees this body funded by a pub­lish­ing com­mu­nity worth $40 bil­lion for just $80 mil­lion —  to give us all what he terms “a fight­ing chance to remake our indus­try and our­selves in a way that reflects, to bor­row the phrase, our bet­ter angels.”

And … it should be mea­sured by out­comes that improve the extent to which con­tent is use­fully con­sumed.  The objec­tive here isn’t just effi­ciency (though that is impor­tant); it’s ulti­mately our goal to place read­ing at the cen­ter of a social and civic con­ver­sa­tion. Build­ing some­thing big­ger than our­selves can moti­vate in ways that a litany of con­fer­ences, trade shows, and con­fabs never will approach.

How could any right-thinking lover of lit say no to this? Before we could col­lect the answers to that one, the bunkers were heav­ily hard­ened, the reserves were called up, I think I heard Gen. Press­field men­tion mar­tial law…and Han­ni­bal in the Alps.

@ com­modi­ties went fully global in the early 1980s, for exam­ple. “Global” to book pub­lish­ers seems to mean “owned by Europeans”
@brianoleary
Brian O’Leary

 

Pub­lish­ing: To arms (Wein­man, Owen, Stone, Nazaryan)

Sarah Wein­man at Pub­lish­ers Lunch was the first voice I heard sound­ing the alarm, bricks and mor­tar shells, incom­ing. It was the 31st: No, Barnes & Noble Won’t Stock Ama­zon Pub­lish­ing Titles in Their Stores.

Laura Haz­ard Owen sprang to the wire­less and raised  Businessweek’s Brad Stone.  She worked Google+ up one cir­cle and down another, to decode the state­ment B&N was issu­ing. And in her story Barnes & Noble: We Will Not Carry Ama­zon Pub­lish­ing Titles In Our Stores, it became clear how seri­ous a moment we’d reached when we read Barnes & Noble’s bel­li­cose prose.

I’ll excerpt here for you the gravest invec­tive of B&N’s chief mer­chan­dis­ing offi­cer, Jaime Carey, empha­sis mine:

Our deci­sion is based on Amazon’s con­tin­ued push for exclu­siv­ity with pub­lish­ers, agents and the authors they rep­re­sent. These exclu­sives have pro­hib­ited us from offer­ing cer­tain eBooks to our cus­tomers. Their actions have under­mined the indus­try as a whole and have pre­vented mil­lions of cus­tomers from hav­ing access to con­tent.

There’s more.

It’s clear to us that Ama­zon has proven they would not be a good pub­lish­ing part­ner to Barnes & Noble as they con­tinue to pull con­tent off the mar­ket for their own self inter­est.

This is village-burning rhetoric, aimed as it is by one major cor­po­rate entity at another, much more com­bustible than stan­dard B2B trash talk.

Of course, there was the pre­dictable reverie in cer­tain quar­ters — the “Fight!” boys on the play­ground jumped right in.

For exam­ple, there’s the Daily News’ story from Alexan­der Nazaryan head­lined with typ­i­cal restraint, Barnes & Noble to Ama­zon: Drop Dead!

Like read­ing The Onion, no?

Nazaryan does get off one good point, despite the high rag con­tent of his newsprint:

Never mind that Barnes & Noble killed off plenty of smaller book­stores dur­ing the good years of the 90’s, when a healthy econ­omy and the real estate boom that fol­lowed allowed it to expand with seem­ing aban­don. Per­haps this is sim­ply a case of just desserts for the dimin­ished bookseller.

Video, slides and tran­script of my #ibt12 pub­lish­ing ana­lyt­ics and book mar­ket­ing talk http://t.co/DMFd25IP
@gunzalis
Peter Collingridge

 

Pub­lish­ing: Whose side is the Author’s Guild on? (Gonzalez)

More curi­ous is a piece from the Authors Guild. In Publishing’s Ecosys­tem on the Brink: The Back­story, the Guild finds itself aligned with Barry Lynn’s lament over monop­o­lies in Harper’s (here is an excerpt). Lynn quotes the unnamed “head of one of the largest pub­lish­ing houses in the U.S.” say­ing that Jeff Bezos is “reck­less” and “dan­ger­ous.” Another unnamed hon­cho, this time of a small pub­lish­ing house, pouts, “Ama­zon is a bully.” The Guild arti­cle, in fact, seems rather embar­rass­ingly monop­o­lized by Lynn’s story.

The Authors Guild — which appar­ently sees no need to byline the author of its own essay here — ends up in painful com­par­isons of pub­lish­ing to chicken proces­sors and microbrewers.

But what may be the most remark­able thing about this piece is that the Guild seems to have missed out on about a year of dis­cus­sion in our fair com­mu­nity. As Guy LeCharles Gon­za­lez writes in If not read­ers… on Google+:

There’s a lot wrong with this heav­ily biased and sur­pris­ingly myopic look at the sup­posed “back­story” of the pub­lish­ing indus­try, but per­haps the most galling line in the whole thing is this state­ment: “the rel­e­vant mar­ket isn’t readers.”

Here’s what he’s talk­ing about the Guild say­ing. I did a double-take, too:

For book pub­lish­ers, the rel­e­vant mar­ket isn’t read­ers (direct sales are few), but booksellers.

Say what? When all is connection-with-the-reader and fra­ter­nité and break­ing bread with the lambs and lying down with the con­sumers? And what of the holy cru­sade for cus­tomer ser­vice? Gon­za­lez again, empha­sis his:

Ama­zon has always under­stood that read­ers are the most rel­e­vant mar­ket and that’s why they’re in the posi­tion of power they’re cur­rently enjoy­ing. Do they wield their big stick aggres­sively? Def­i­nitely. And so did B&N and Bor­ders before them, and pre­sum­ably whomever the boogey­man was prior to them were guilty of the same thing. One could argue…that pub­lish­ers them­selves have been sim­i­larly as guilty in their deal­ings with authors.

The Guild writes, “Ama­zon com­mands about 75% of the online mar­ket for print books, and 60% of the ebook mar­ket.” Shall we then bite that hand so very hard? And on behalf of the authors who feed from it?

Say it with me, Guy, #cmon­son.

Authors Guild says, “For book pub­lish­ers, the rel­e­vant mar­ket isn’t read­ers.” They are so VERY wrong. http://t.co/QuztIkjv #dbw
@glecharles
Guy L. Gonzalez

Click to read this week’s full Writ­ing on the Ether col­umn at JaneFriedman.com.

About Porter Ander­son

Porter Ander­son, BA, MA, MFA, is a Fel­low with the National Crit­ics Insti­tute and has done spe­cial read­ings in the psy­chol­ogy of the arts at the Uni­ver­sity of Bath, UK. As a jour­nal­ist, he has worked with three net­works of CNN (CNN USA, CNN Inter­na­tional, CNN.com) and was on the lead devel­op­ment team for CNN.com Live. He also has worked on The Vil­lage Voice, Dal­las Times Her­ald, D Mag­a­zine, Sara­sota Herald-Tribune and other out­lets. He writes the weekly (Thurs­days) WRITING ON THE ETHER col­umn at JaneFriedman.com and (Mon­days) ETHER FOR AUTHORS col­umn at PublishingPerspectives.com. Ander­son also is a reg­u­lar con­trib­u­tor to WriterUnboxed.com and to Dig­i­tal Book World’s (DigiBookWorld.com) Expert Pub­lish­ing Blog. He has been posted by the United Nations to Rome (P-5, laissez-passer) for the World Food Pro­gramme, and served as Exec­u­tive Pro­ducer to INDEX: Design to Improve Life in Copen­hagen. He is based in Tampa and his pri­mary medium is Twit­ter. Fol­low him @Porter_Anderson

Writing on the Ether | JaneFriedman.com

The CEOs panel, mod­er­ated by F+W Media CEO David Nuss­baum, was onstage 24 Jan­u­ary at the Dig­i­tal Book World Con­fer­ence + Expo.

By Porter Ander­son | @Porter_Anderson

 

From Jan­u­ary 26, 2012
Part of my series of columns on pub­lish­ing, Writ­ing on the Ether, appear­ing Thurs­days through the kind (and brave) benev­o­lence of Jane Fried­man at JaneFriedman.com

 

Ether” / Or?

Just as the round tables were rolled into the Met­ro­pol­i­tan Ball­room for the pre-conference DBW Mar­ket­ing Sum­mit

Just as the chillers cooled the low-pile car­peted pitch, slammed so bravely in those third-floor meet­ing halls…

Just as pub­lish­ing indus­try stake­hold­ers talked of achiev­ing the “impact­ful dis­cov­ery of niche mar­kets through metadata”…

A small door at the back of the Sher­a­ton New York Hotel and Tow­ers … clicked shut again for another year.

Appar­ently almost none of my tweets ever made it out of the Cone of WiFi Silence that was #dbw’s meet­ing room at the Sheraton.
@DonLinn
Don Linn

Did you hear it? Shhh. Lis­ten. Hear that? Nah.

No more than you could hear DBW’s Pub­lish­ing Inno­va­tion Awards’ new QEDs announced over the din of Mon­day evening’s cock­tail reception.

That author stand­ing in dark­ness is Barry Eisler at WDC (Jan. 21, 2012) / Photo by Dan Blank

That author stand­ing in dark­ness is Barry Eisler at WDC (Jan. 21, 2012) / Photo by Dan Blank

No more than you could read the big-screen dis­plays of the good Jack McKeown’s Verso Adver­tis­ing slides about book-buying behav­ior Wednesday.

No more than you could be sure that it was really Barry Eisler on Sat­ur­day as he spoke in the annual dark­ness of the Sheraton’s New York Ball­room place of honor. The speaker in the mid­dle of that room gets less lime­light than a Rock­ette shop­ping her memoir.

In fact, NaNoW­riMo founder Chris Baty also spoke in that dim loca­tion. I might have guessed it was either John Malke­vitch or Seth Godin on Viki Noe‘s shoul­ders, ship it.

Gath­er­ing for the first ple­nary ses­sion of the 2012 Dig­i­tal Book World Conference.

Gath­er­ing for the first ple­nary ses­sion of the 2012 Dig­i­tal Book World Conference.

If  you have a “wait — what?” sen­sa­tion when I men­tion bookly events on Sat­ur­day and Sun­day — or if you look at the well-lit stage (left) at the Dig­i­tal Book World Con­fer­ence + Expo and won­der if you’re in the same busi­ness — then your hear­ing is improving.

Wasn’t that the pitter-patter of writ­ers leav­ing the building?

And they missed such a good panel of lit­er­ary agents Tues­day, some hand­some can­dor at the table. Here was Brian DeFiore men­tion­ing that “indie” just isn’t the right term for a self-publishing writer. He’s right, it’s a euphemism. And Liza Daw­son described her project with two exist­ing clients — “we’re the guinea pigs” — to explore together the ins and outs of self-publication.

Then there was the take-no-prisoners sass of Gin­ger Clark say­ing that if an author insists on self-publishing a project, “Ulti­mately? The client is my boss. I get out of the way or I lose that client.”

Clark, who works with the Asso­ci­a­tion of Authors’ Rep­re­sen­ta­tives as does  DeFiore, got off another good point: “If my client self-publishes, I’m not the pub­lisher. The author’s name is on that con­tract, not mine.” At a time when the arrival of the agent-publisher is wor­ry­ing a lot of us, Clark’s clar­i­fi­ca­tion is right, and timely.

I’m sorry our writ­ers didn’t hear this panel and many other ses­sions of DBW.

The words of #dbw12: dis­cov­er­abil­ity; meta­data; direct-to-consumer; DOWNTON ABBEY.
@Ginger_Clark
Gin­ger Clark

 

Click to read this week’s full Writ­ing on the Ether col­umn at JaneFriedman.com

 

About Porter Ander­son

Porter Ander­son, BA, MA, MFA, is a Fel­low with the National Crit­ics Insti­tute and has done spe­cial read­ings in the psy­chol­ogy of the arts at the Uni­ver­sity of Bath, UK. As a jour­nal­ist, he has worked with three net­works of CNN (CNN USA, CNN Inter­na­tional, CNN.com) and was on the lead devel­op­ment team for CNN.com Live. He also has worked on The Vil­lage Voice, Dal­las Times Her­ald, D Mag­a­zine, Sara­sota Herald-Tribune and other out­lets. He writes the weekly (Thurs­days) WRITING ON THE ETHER col­umn at JaneFriedman.com and (Mon­days) ETHER FOR AUTHORS col­umn at PublishingPerspectives.com. Ander­son also is a reg­u­lar con­trib­u­tor to WriterUnboxed.com and to Dig­i­tal Book World’s (DigiBookWorld.com) Expert Pub­lish­ing Blog. He has been posted by the United Nations to Rome (P-5, laissez-passer) for the World Food Pro­gramme, and served as Exec­u­tive Pro­ducer to INDEX: Design to Improve Life in Copen­hagen. He is based in Tampa and his pri­mary medium is Twit­ter. Fol­low him @Porter_Anderson

Writing on the Ether | JaneFriedman.com

iStockphoto / JoshBlake

iStock­photo / JoshBlake

By Porter Ander­son | @Porter_Anderson

 

From Jan­u­ary 19, 2012
Part of my series of columns on pub­lish­ing, Writ­ing on the Ether, appear­ing Thurs­days through the kind (and brave) benev­o­lence of Jane Fried­man at JaneFriedman.com

 

Imme­di­ate seat­ing available

For once, it doesn’t mat­ter how cold it is in New York. As the first big annual F+W Media con­fer­ences of 2012 heave into action, the uphol­stery is toasty. Con­fab­World is cooking.

And we don’t have to wait for the mas­sive Dig­i­tal Book World Con­fer­ence & Expo to open on Mon­day. Atten­dees of the Writer’s Digest Con­fer­ence, which opens Fri­day, will find them­selves in a Sev­enth Avenue salon super­heated by the snick­ers of self-publishing authors who think they have the biz licked – and by the fum­ing of other writ­ers deter­mined to go less gen­tly into that 99-cents furnace.

Just arrived New York. Sunny! Mak­ing an LA boy feel wel­come. #wdc12
@jamesscottbell
James Scott Bell

 

To reas­sure you quickly: you don’t have to be there to be there.

If you’re not able to join us on the hearth and find your own chaise-chaude in our book-ly ball­rooms, no prob­lem. We’ll be sure some smoke gets in your eyes.

Warmed by the socia­bil­ity of new media, our indus­try loves Twit­ter. Per­haps you’ve noticed. Well, of course you have. So keep these hash­tags handy: #wdc12 and #dbw12. Another good one to add day­time ET on Mon­day is #dbw­sum – that’s the DBW Mar­ket­ing Sum­mit.

I’m @Porter_Anderson in the Twee­t­erie, as you likely know, and you’re wel­come to shoot up a flare with any ques­tions. I’ll imme­di­ately hand them to Jane Fried­man, oth­er­wise known as Porter’s Brain.

Also: soft­ware will­ing, my site’s home page – PorterAnderson.com – will dis­play a self-refreshing cap­ture of hash­tagged tweets. I’ll be doing my live-tweet cov­er­age of select ses­sions, from top to bot­tom, in hopes of giv­ing you a coher­ent account of the pro­ceed­ings. And our com­mu­nity is unham­pered by shy­ness when it comes to blog­ging, colum­niz­ing, opin­ing, and scrawl­ing on vacant walls at ConfabWorld.

You keep an eye on the tweets. We’ll keep you going with comely confabulation.

Gear­ing up for a real live writer’s con­fer­ence! Alter­nat­ing between puk­ing with excite­ment and puk­ing from nerves. #wdc12
@jasonevermorr
Jason Everett Morris

 

I also can offer you a series of pre­view arti­cles, with both text and video. Con­fer­ence speaker Dan Blank of We Grow Media and I have put them together:

And as we the peo­ple of let­ters con­vene, I want to cat­a­log some of the  kin­dling – sorry, wrong word – a few of the drier twigs, that’s bet­ter, which are fuel­ing what surely is among the most fired-up con­fer­ence sea­son this busi­ness has seen since Mar­garet Mitchell fanned those other flames.

Every chair at the Sher­a­ton New York Hotel & Tow­ers is a hot seat. That’s because just about any­body who can make it to a reg­is­tra­tion table can accuse all the oth­ers of mess­ing up every­thing — and be accused of mess­ing up everything.

We’re going to see 70 agents slammed by 90-second pitches from 450 authors for three long hours at WDC.

And while the car­pet is being replaced after that, cast a wary eye over this list of com­pa­nies attend­ing DBW. Yes, that’s Our Friends From Seat­tle and Google and Barnes & Noble and Apple and the Big Three-Plus-Three and the top 400 part­ners and rivals imme­di­ately south of them — all up in there at once.

Be aware that the near­est exit may be behind you. This could sim­ply dis­in­te­grate into a 1,200-person brawl in the ball­room. Shall we finally start jack­ing up authors’ roy­al­ties? Roy­al­ties? I got your authors’ roy­al­ties right here. Why not just slug it out and be done with it?  (I like “brawl­room,” don’t you?)

Watch for dis­count code DBWFIGHT, $40 off on your ambu­lance ride.

 

And as the news media close in for their spe­cial cov­er­age, here are just a few says you might see the tracer fire fly on Reuters’ video:

  • How do agents feel about self-publishing authors these days? How do agents feel about pub­lish­ers? How do agents feel about agent-publishers? How do agent-publishers sleep at night?
  • How do tra­di­tion­ally pub­lished authors feel about agents? And com­mis­sions? And self-publishing authors who brag about hav­ing no commissions?
  • How do small pub­lish­ers feel about the Big Four-Plus-Two?
  • How do the Big Six’s staffers feel about being told in meet­ings, “You guys bet­ter digi-up”?
  • How do any of us feel about meta­data? It’s dri­ven Laura Daw­son to knitting.
  • How do inde­pen­dent book­store own­ers feel about the Interwebs?
  • How do librar­i­ans feel things are going? Pack a lunch before you ask that.
  • How do self-publishing authors feel about every­body? Okay, we, we know that already.
  • How does every­body feel about Amazon?
  • And does Ama­zon feel any­thing at all?

So don’t get com­fort­able, know what I mean? Don’t sit back and relax. Sit for­ward and be tense.

I’m flaber­gasted by how much inter­est there is in my ses­sion with Bill Newlin of Avalon about meta­data at #dbw12. I blame @
@ftoolan
Fran Toolan

 

I’m going to run you through a quick litany of mul­ti­ple view­points. The road to Con­fab­World this year is paved with hot coals. Try to keep up:

I know a few agents, and they’re tear­ing their hair out. An agent recently told me “edi­tors in big pub­lish­ers are basi­cally read­ers for mar­ket­ing depart­ments.” Another said in the past year she’d got more than 10 excel­lent books to edi­to­r­ial board, with all the edi­tors staunchly behind them, but mar­ket­ing vetoed them. An edi­tor I know – very senior in terms of job title and the pub­lisher she works for – laments that she is no longer allowed to accept the rich fic­tion she loves to read and has to pub­lish shal­low sure-fire super­mar­ket titles.

London-based author, best­selling ghost­writer, and writ­ing instruc­tor Roz Mor­ris writes these and more telling obser­va­tions in Why play­ing safe in pub­lish­ing is riskier than ever

We’re too savvy to make these #self­pub­lish­ing mis­takes, so pass this to some­one who might http://t.co/vT5nrFdx #books #authors #writ­ers
@dirtywhitecandy
Roz Mor­ris

 

The major pub­lish­ers have com­pletely abdi­cated respon­si­bil­ity for pro­duc­ing the dig­i­tal ver­sions of their cat­a­logs: it’s all handed over to ama­teurs. You see it through­out the indus­try. From the typo­graph­i­cal hor­ror of most eBooks, through to the lack­lus­ter iPad titles being produced.

Chris Stevens is inter­viewed by the Toronto Review of Books in Chris Stevens on Alice for the iPad, Book Apps, and Toronto: a Q & A

Chris Stevens dis­cusses his overnight sen­sa­tion of an inter­ac­tive book app, Alice for the iPad. The app is based… http://t.co/vEI4utqv
@WestVanLibrary
West Van Library

 

It seems to me that those of us who sell goods – be they books, white goods, clothes or any­thing else – need to learn to think far more closely about the user experience.

Sheila Boun­ford in On Expe­ri­ence at Off the Page (and What of the Book?) before remind­ing us “Dr Seuss famously said ‘Some­times the ques­tions are com­pli­cated and the answers are sim­ple’” in On Change (via Dr Seuss & W H Auden) 

@ thanks for the RT, Don. I like to keep my cul­tural ref­er­ences as eclec­tic as possible…
@SheilaB01
Sheila Boun­ford

 

The over­rid­ing message…is that books are an entre­pre­neur­ial exer­cise, com­bin­ing the selec­tion of a sub­ject, the self-confidence to stay with it through the report­ing and writ­ing ordeal, and a com­mit­ment to mar­ket­ing the results, which for many authors is an espe­cially unfa­mil­iar process.

Peter Osnos at The Atlantic writes Good Writ­ing Isn’t Enough: How to Sell a Book in the Dig­i­tal Age, an arti­cle he bases on the Nie­man Foun­da­tion for Inves­tiga­tive Journalism’s excel­lent Nie­man Reports edi­tion titled Writ­ing the Book(a free download)

Good Writ­ing Isn’t Enough: How to Sell a Book in the Dig­i­tal Age — Peter Osnos — Enter­tain­ment — The Atlantic http://t.co/JrBZsXk1
@fiiblog
Ricardo Lourenço

 

While writ­ing this post, it felt anti­quated how best­seller lists still seg­ment out sales by edi­tion (hard­cover, paper­back, mass mar­ket, elec­tronic). If these lists are printed to serve and inform readers—and per­haps that’s a huge assumption?—how much does this dis­tinc­tion mat­ter, except to those inside the indus­try? How much do these dis­tinc­tions serve to keep the old par­a­digms in place? (E.g., “hard­cov­ers” are more impor­tant or mean­ing­ful than “paperbacks”?)

Jane Fried­man, Uni­ver­sity of Cincin­nati new-media pro­fes­sor, indus­try ana­lyst, and long-suffering host of the Ether here at her site, preps for one of her pre­sen­ta­tions at WDC this week­end in eBook Sta­tis­tics For Authors to Watch, writ­ing, “You can not only find var­i­ous data sets, you can also find many inter­pre­ta­tions“

I’m speak­ing at @ event this wkend. See my top ses­sion picks: http://t.co/FL5E6DJd [+save 20% if you haven’t registered]
@JaneFriedman
Jane Fried­man

 

As tra­di­tional pub­lish­ers exper­i­ment with ebook sales…it seems they may be push­ing self-published authors off the list…The aver­age price of a self-published Kin­dle top-100 best­seller con­tin­ues to drop, but a new look at these titles’ per­for­mance in 2011 sug­gests these books are fac­ing increased com­pe­ti­tion from tra­di­tional publishers.

Laura Haz­ard Owen, who assid­u­ously cov­ers pub­lish­ing for paid­Con­tent, has this inter­est­ing analy­sis in Did Self-Publishing Hype Hit Its Peak In 2011?

No more new Pen­guin down­load­able audio­books in libraries. Which pub­lisher will be next to pull their titles? http://t.co/5YHitigb
@laurahazardowen
Laura Haz­ard Owen

 

Amanda Hocking’s “books from Trylle Tril­ogy were removed from dis­tri­b­u­tion in August, will be repub­lished in weeks, in print and dig­i­tal for­mats – and cost a few times more.… In 2011 self-publishing was bear­ing the badge of novelty. Now it becomes the part of the dig­i­tal pub­lish­ing landscape…Publishers and authors would like to avoid such sto­ries (as Hocking’s) and that’s why they’ll find each other much sooner – and that means that less good qual­ity books will come out as self-published ones.

Piotr Kowal­czyk writes up his Top Self-published Kin­dle Ebooks of 2011 [Report], as Jane Fried­mannotes, a “help­ful pars­ing of Ama­zon data” with which we can begin to dis­cern “Is the 99-cent price tag for e-books wear­ing out?” and other issues

2011 was a year of books being self-published in “bulk”. Such a thing is not gonna hap­pen again http://t.co/dehBZgHo
@namenick
Piotr Kowal­czyk

 

We should stop think­ing of self-publishing sim­ply as a nice way for indie authors to be pub­lished. Viewed another way, mea­sur­ing self-publishing activ­ity cal­cu­lates the amount of money Ama­zon (and oth­ers) are no longer shar­ing with pub­lish­ers. And it’s grow­ing.

The empha­sis is mine. This ring­ing com­ment comes from the Milano office of ATKear­ney in its upcom­ing report at DBW. Mike Shatzkin, con­fer­ence coun­cil chair, used it this week in his walkup to some of the data ses­sions in the con­fer­ence ahead, Show me the data!I may give it one more ride in a later seg­ment of the Ether, as one of the most pen­e­trat­ing evo­ca­tions yet of the indus­try — inclu­sive of Amazon

I’m at ABA’s Win­ter Insti­tute, learn­ing things. Highly inspired and amused by Ann Patchett’s great talk this morning.
@MikeShatzkin
Mike Shatzkin

 

I get mil­lions of hits a year on this blog. When peo­ple dis­cuss self-pubbing, my name often comes up. But the peo­ple who visit this blog, and dis­cuss my self-publishing efforts, are writ­ers. Writ­ers aren’t buy­ing my fic­tion. They aren’t buy­ing my non-fiction either–I have an ebook called A Newbie’s Guide to Pub­lish­ing and it is among my lowest-selling titles. The peo­ple who buy me are read­ers, and the vast major­ity have never heard of me. Read­ers find me on Ama­zon, because Ama­zon has made it easy for my books to be dis­cov­ered… If one of Amazon’s imprints offers to pub­lish you, accept. Right now they are the only pub­lisher who can increase your sales.

Joe Kon­rath – as he says, “Peo­ple con­sider me to be one of the mouth­pieces of the self-publishing move­ment” – here takes on The Value of Pub­lic­ity, posi­tion­ing it as fairly anal­o­gous to the stan­dard author plat­form encour­aged today

Kon­rath posts his Kin­dle num­bers. http://t.co/rZnZdqEA
@jakonrath
JA Kon­rath

 

We’ve com­piled an infor­mal account of all of the self-published ebook authors to make the NYT best­seller lists last year with an orig­i­nal work (thus we are not includ­ing reis­sues or short-form pieces). Con­trary to the pop­u­lar impres­sion, the total num­ber is…11. The authors, along with the date of the first appear­ance on the list, are:

Nancy John­son (2/20)
Vic­torine Lieske (3/6)
Stephanie McAfee (3/27)
Heather Killough-Walden (5/1)
John Locke (5/8)
Court­ney Milan (7/10)
Dar­cie Chan (8/28)
Chris Cul­ver (9/4)
Rick Murcer (9/4)
CJ Lyons (9/11)

The one self-published non­fic­tion author to make the list was Sarah Burleton, whose WHY ME? debuted on the 10/2 list

Michael Cader, writ­ing at Publisher’s Lunch in How Many Self-Published Authors Were Best­sellers In 2011? has the above sober­ing num­bers, sug­gest­ing, as has been stressed many times, that the Kon­raths and Hock­ings (pre-St. Martin’s) are excep­tions to the rule. And Laura Haz­ard Owen’s head­line above about self-publishing hype hav­ing hit a kind of peak in 2011, bears seri­ous consideration

Guess­ing Bertelsmann’s Results; Adding Grain of Salt http://t.co/s1RRvoEv [reg. rqrd.]
@PublishersLunch
Pub­lish­er­sLunch

 

Twi­light and The Hunger Games showed young adult fic­tion to be a poten­tial gold­mine. Authors and pub­lish­ers quickly latched onto the galaxy of online book sites, where a vast young read­er­ship roams, as the key to global suc­cess. But can you har­ness that energy? Should you even try? More and more blog­gers are reluc­tant to host the author blog tours that now swamp book sites – only to find that pub­lish­ers refuse them free advance review copies of the new books they want. Who wins there?

Julie Bertagna, in YA novel read­ers clash with pub­lish­ing estab­lish­ment at the Guardian reminds us that another issue dog­ging the indus­try is the abrupt dif­fu­sion of crit­i­cal voices. The rise of blog­ging review­ers sim­ply pulls the rug out from under yet another once-orderly, stan­dard­ized ele­ment of busi­ness, the assump­tion and pro­to­col of mainstream-media crit­i­cism. As Bertagna sees it, “The hard­est thing a writer has to learn is that once you pub­lish a book, it’s no longer truly yours.”

@ So lets talk tips and tac­tics… for us lot back home cop­ing with 3am #mur­ray coaster. #Andy­nap first or #sleep­is­fortheweak?
@JulieBertagna
Julie Bertagna

 

It is unde­ni­able: we are at trans­for­ma­tion. And I sus­pect that 2012 may well be the most impor­tant year in any of our pro­fes­sional lives and, quite pos­si­bly, in the his­tory of the book. With that in mind, I wanted to share some of our 2011 year-end results for Source­books. While these data points are just for one pub­lisher, we believe that they can help us bet­ter think about the year that we get to cre­ate in 2012. I hope that they help you as well.

Dominique Rac­cah, pub­lisher at Source­books, announces a superb per­for­mance for 2011, includ­ing an 19-percent increase in rev­enue growth and print-book sales run­ning 11 points higher than the Bookscan aver­age. It’s in the ebooks arena that she trum­pets some of her most ebul­lient news this way:

Source: Sourcebooks Next "Some interesting results from 2011"
Source: Source­books Next “Some inter­est­ing results from 2011″
kid you not RT @ Shakespeare’s ‘The Tem­pest’ Barred from Ari­zona Pub­lic Schools | WSJ Law Blog http://t.co/ku2P3pMj
@draccah
Dominique Rac­cah

 

Click to read this week’s full Writ­ing on the Ether col­umn at JaneFriedman.com

About Porter Ander­son

Porter Ander­son, BA, MA, MFA, is a Fel­low with the National Crit­ics Insti­tute and has done spe­cial read­ings in the psy­chol­ogy of the arts at the Uni­ver­sity of Bath, UK. As a jour­nal­ist, he has worked with three net­works of CNN (CNN USA, CNN Inter­na­tional, CNN.com) and was on the lead devel­op­ment team for CNN.com Live. He also has worked on The Vil­lage Voice, Dal­las Times Her­ald, D Mag­a­zine, Sara­sota Herald-Tribune and other out­lets. He writes the weekly (Thurs­days) WRITING ON THE ETHER col­umn at JaneFriedman.com and (Mon­days) ETHER FOR AUTHORS col­umn at PublishingPerspectives.com. Ander­son also is a reg­u­lar con­trib­u­tor to WriterUnboxed.com and to Dig­i­tal Book World’s (DigiBookWorld.com) Expert Pub­lish­ing Blog. He has been posted by the United Nations to Rome (P-5, laissez-passer) for the World Food Pro­gramme, and served as Exec­u­tive Pro­ducer to INDEX: Design to Improve Life in Copen­hagen. He is based in Tampa and his pri­mary medium is Twit­ter. Fol­low him @Porter_Anderson